![]() |
|
|||||||
| GuitarGeek.Com | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Marshall JCM 900 vs. Mesa Boogie Mark IV
What do you guys think is the better head? The Marshall JCM 900 or the Mesa Boogie Mark IV? IF there's an amp that you think beats both, list that one too!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
jcm900 is cool for solid crunch and a ok clean channel.
the mark 4 has many more bells and whistles and options. if you are a tweaker or very tone savy the mark 4 might be for you. I personally would rather have a jcm900 for the set it and forget kind of sound. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Mark IV just plain destroys the JCM900. Sure it takes tweaking to get tones out of it, but it sounds awesome and full compared the JCM 900 which to my ears is pretty thin and lacks bass.
__________________
www.wxut.com Guitars: Fender Strat ESP Explorer Epi Les Paul Current Pedal Board: PS-2=>Barber Tone Press=>EH Graphic Fuzz=>Vintage Rat=>TS-1 Trem=>Small Stone=>Giga Delay=>PDS 20/20=>Headrush E2=> Digiverb Amps: Framus Dragon,Modded Peavey VTM120 Cab: Crate 4x12(Ear Candy Buzzbomb 2x12 w/Wizards soon) |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Which is better at being a fruit - apples or oranges?
Personally, I'd take the Mark IV.
__________________
Axes: Fender Custom Shop Strat (Fred) / MIJ Strat (Fralin '54s) / MIJ Tele / Dillion LP (Fralins) / Dot (SD Ants) / PRS: McCarty Brazilian / Custom 22 Rosewood Artist / Archtop II Rig: -> 535Q wah -> DOD FX56/ProCo RAT -> E13 TBD -> loop { Digitech RDS 3.6, phase inverted { dry -> 3-knob EHX Bad Stone -> ADA Rocket 20}} -> Mesa Maverick, or GarageBand. * BC Rich ST3 (SD Custom) -> Boogie Mark IIC+; 2 1x12 EV 12S's I gave the Maverick to nyrkickazz1, Other stuff: a Ric 360/12 in baby blue; an '83 MIJ Squier P-bass; a Martin HD-28V; and now I have a Mesa Mark IV long head too. __ "Arise, goddess; invest thyself in these, thy shining raiment, and ensconced in Phaeton's chariot float your starréd way to the Liquor Control Board of Ontario." |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Live Rig GUITARS -- 2 Burny RLC-70S's (Japanese Les Paul Custom copies) and a Japanese-made Fender Strat.Stage guitars FX - Dunlop 95Q Crybaby wah - Vox TonelabLE multi-FX processor/amp-modeler - Boss GE-7 EQ - Boss DD-5 Digital Delay - Boss NS-2 Noise Suppressor. AMPLIFICATION - Modded Ampeg VT-22 (V4) 100-watt head (6L6GC power tubes) - Soldano 4X12 straight cabinet loaded w/Eminence Legend speakers. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Its like comparing apples and oranges, the JCM900 being a crabapple and the Mark IV being a big, juicy blood orange. Seriously, though, the Mark IV is much more versatile and has a fuller sound. The 900 is good at crunch, while the Mark IV is good for almost anything, if you tweak it long enough. The nice thing about JCM900s, though is that you can find the best tones in it in a few minutes, while on the Mark IV it can take months.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Mark IV is my dream amp, so I'm gonna have to go ahead and say the Mark IV.
The only thing is that it may take a week or 2 to find the exact tone you're looking for with a Mark IV (but the tone you're looking for IS there). With a JCM 900, if you want the Marshall tone, you can get in about 5 mins. If that's not the sound you want, well, too bad.
__________________
| gear | Fender Stratocaster or Baracuda Les Paul Copy > Ibanez TS-7 > MXR Phase-100 > Ibanez DE-7 > Marshall AVT50 | want list | Fender Classic 60s Telecaster Digitech Digiverb Voodoo Labs Tremolo | style | ...And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Dead - Refused - Explosions In The Sky - Sparta - Mogwai - Far - Pedro The Lion - Sloan - old Smashing Pumpkins - Seam |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll be able to tell you in a few hours since theres gonna be a MarkIV on my door
![]() They are totally different amps. Im 99% sure i'll like Mark IV more than the JCM 900 i checked out a year back but when it comes to amps, just try and hear them for yourself. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
if you're willing to spend some time figuring it out, the mark IV is the better amp.
that said, the jcm900 isn't a bad amp. it's simpler and you'll know whether or not it's a keeper a hell of a lot sooner
__________________
Guitar.Cable.Amp. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mark iv every time. Jcm900s are IMO the worst marshall JCM. Brittle and harsh are words that spring to mind.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hahaha! Ok, then the 900 seemed the MOST brittle and harsh marshall out of the jcm series!
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe you should ask LnTh...
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
mark IV
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Member of the Grammar Nazis Rig: USA Fat Strat/Epi LP- Mesa Mark III- Sniper GE-7- Danelectro Fish n' Chips- Classic Crybaby- MXR ZW-44 Gas: ISP Decimator, Ibanez AD9, MXR Phase 90, pickups
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|