GeekChat!  

Go Back   GeekChat! > HOME RECORDING > Recording Gear

Reply

Share/Bookmark

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01.06.10, 3:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 180
deftones is an unknown quantity at this point
reccomendations for recording gear

i need to get myself a recording setup for about £200 but need help as there are so many different recording devices available, ideally id like something like a portastudio and a microphone and keep it as simple as that, id be using it to piece together ideas into songs and to record my practicing so i dont need anything too complex.

ive noticed the new tascam pocketstudio dp004, would this be a good option? i just dont want to plunge in and find that its **** after spending £200

in regards to a microphone would a simple sm57 do the job well?

all opinions welcome.
__________________
Guitar:
Admira classical
Gretsch Pro Jet
Fender MIJ Stratocaster

Effects:
turbo rat, fish & chips eq, mini qtron, mxr stereo chorus, RC-20XL, Cathedral, Memory Toy, Flanger Hoax, 74' phase 90, 76' dyna comp.

Amp:
Laney VC15
Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 01.06.10, 6:16 AM
Uome's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,541
Uome is on a distinguished road
I've had good results with the Line 6 Toneport but you might want to upgrade from the 4-track Ableton software that comes with it. The bass amps aren't good though and you need a drum program to actually make something worth listening. Oh, wait you're that guy who wanted those Alesis drumcomputers right?

As for microphones I can't really speak. I have a Rode NT1-A and an M1 but I've never used any others, so I'm by no means an expert. Besides that they consume the biggest part of your budget. The NT1-A is actually a really good allround mic, I use it for amps, acoustic stuff and saxophones.

Reaper works fine for recording on a pc but you don't want to go digital right?

Does that help at all?
__________________
I reject reality and substitute my own

Last edited by Uome; 01.06.10 at 6:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01.06.10, 7:17 AM
Rents's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bethnal Green, London
Posts: 832
Rents is an unknown quantity at this point
edirol soundcard are fairly cheap... they have direct ins or you can pick up sm57s on ebay for under £70 easy

honestly, i'd say torrent a major DAW... that's what most people on a budget do

/a
__________________
http://jtreole.tumblr.com/
http://twitter.com/JTreole
http://soundcloud.com/j-treole
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alijamieson/

Nord Electro 3 = Korg Mini KP = Digitech TimeBender

Novation XioSynth = Alesis Bitrman = Roland FV500L = Line 6 FM-4
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01.06.10, 2:32 PM
lobsty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: between Berlin and Melbourne...
Posts: 2,309
lobsty is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by deftones View Post
in regards to a microphone would a simple sm57 do the job well?
What will you be recording?
If you're mic'ing a guitar amp than a 57 should definitely be your first port of call. Some people prefer other mics and there a million to choose from but there is a reason 57's are used so often on guitar cabs : because they work!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01.06.10, 4:05 PM
Cham Clowder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brampton/Toronto, ON (Canadia)
Posts: 764
Cham Clowder is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Cham Clowder
How do the 57s take vocals? Like, is it at least decent? Or do you need to get all professional and have a dozen mics for every possible application?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01.06.10, 4:15 PM
NoFroBro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,006
NoFroBro is on a distinguished road
SM58=SM57. They are exactly the same microphone with a different diaphragm housing. Go to the Shure site and discover that the frequency response of the SM58 with a switch is apparently greater to the difference between an SM58 without and an SM57!

Having said that the test Shure used probably doesn't fully account for the proximity effects and 'channelling' that the different housing make. Lemmy from Motorhead uses an SM57 for vocals. Issues of taste aside you can always tell it's Lemmy singing.

As to a small recorder to use as a notepad and rehersal reviewer? Zoom make a number of small recorders that are worth a look. One that may suit your specification is designed around the needs of 'tapers' and has a set of balanced condensor mics in an X configuration or some such and has multi-track capabilites. Should be around 200 pound too.
__________________
My Gear , please wack with the side of your hand for normal service.
Bringing you EVIL VOODOO WAX MAGIC since 2009
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01.06.10, 4:23 PM
Cham Clowder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brampton/Toronto, ON (Canadia)
Posts: 764
Cham Clowder is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Cham Clowder
So for general use, probably more guitar than vocal, which would you recommend?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01.06.10, 4:45 PM
knives490's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Clinton, NC
Posts: 1,922
knives490 is an unknown quantity at this point
I dig the Sennheiser that I've had. SM57's are alright, but sound better on speakers to me. The Sennheisers I'm using are GREAT for vocals to my ear. Can't remember the specific model, though.
__________________
Stargazer FX Site

I <3 Michel!
Quote:
Originally Posted by burntumbers View Post
you gotz da mad skillz dawg.

you mod the titties off pedals, and you just got hair on your balls, what, 2 months ago?

I'm pushing 30 and all I can do with a soldering iron is burn myself.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01.06.10, 5:28 PM
cricketchorus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: portland
Posts: 414
cricketchorus is on a distinguished road
The Audix I-5 is another option that works great for both. Sennheiser stuff is really good for the cost.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01.07.10, 12:47 AM
NoFroBro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,006
NoFroBro is on a distinguished road
SM 57 or 58? I'd get an SM 58 as they are a little more robust.
__________________
My Gear , please wack with the side of your hand for normal service.
Bringing you EVIL VOODOO WAX MAGIC since 2009
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01.07.10, 3:49 AM
lobsty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: between Berlin and Melbourne...
Posts: 2,309
lobsty is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoFroBro View Post
SM58=SM57. They are exactly the same microphone with a different diaphragm housing.
Not quite, that's a popular misconception. They are similar but by no means the same...

But as to 57's on vocals, I've never been a fan but there are plenty of people out there who swear by them (in both bedroom and big time studios). I'd take a half decent condenser over a 57 for vocals and acoustic guitars any day but that introduces other problems like the need for phantom power (although many cheap multitracks have at least one channel with phantom power these days). The other downside to condensers is that they are more sensitive room acoustics.

Sorry I can't speak of exact budgets because I have no idea about gear prices in the UK, but maybe see if you can get a second hand 57 because they are often dirt cheap second hand and they are practically unbreakable so there shouldn't be a problem... then you could grab a lower end condenser like a Rode NT1 or one of the cheaper AT mics or something.
Just a thought - not sure how that fits into your budget though - sorry if I've sent you on a tangent!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01.07.10, 5:19 AM
Uome's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,541
Uome is on a distinguished road
That NT1-A is really sensitive. I could hear myself breathe and the metronome through the earplugs in my ear on acoustic stuff. Whether that's good thing is up to you.
__________________
I reject reality and substitute my own
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01.07.10, 9:48 AM
lobsty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: between Berlin and Melbourne...
Posts: 2,309
lobsty is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uome View Post
That NT1-A is really sensitive. I could hear myself breathe and the metronome through the earplugs in my ear on acoustic stuff. Whether that's good thing is up to you.
That's very true - to be honest I don't use mine so much now that I've some much snazzier things but I used an NT1 for years to record everything except guitar cabs : vocals, flute, cello, acoustic guitar, medieval instruments, percussion, as a front mic for drum kits, you name it. Used it on several releases and while it has it's faults it's none too shabby for a cheap mic.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01.07.10, 9:55 AM
Uome's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,541
Uome is on a distinguished road
Quote:
That's very true - to be honest I don't use mine so much now that I've some much snazzier things but I used an NT1 for years to record everything except guitar cabs : vocals, flute, cello, acoustic guitar, medieval instruments, percussion, as a front mic for drum kits, you name it. Used it on several releases and while it has it's faults it's none too shabby for a cheap mic.
Yeah, you told me that. I guess your idea of cheap is different from mine, lol.

By the way, I got my K&M mic stand in the mail today so I'm going to record with that M1 (dynamic) very soon.
__________________
I reject reality and substitute my own
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01.07.10, 10:27 AM
lobsty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: between Berlin and Melbourne...
Posts: 2,309
lobsty is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uome View Post
Yeah, you told me that. I guess your idea of cheap is different from mine, lol.

By the way, I got my K&M mic stand in the mail today so I'm going to record with that M1 (dynamic) very soon.
Well cheap compared with a C414, U87 etc... and let's not even speak of U47's, C12's, 251's etc
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013 | Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO
©1993 - 2013 GuitarGeek | All Rights Reserved